tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1997165993262560791.post5413668084213588699..comments2023-05-02T05:02:24.489-07:00Comments on Extreme Macro: Licking the Bowl DeconstructionDalantechhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17491343159917303555noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1997165993262560791.post-67844558693535914042009-08-08T22:45:42.580-07:002009-08-08T22:45:42.580-07:00Hey Yudha,
It really depends on what you want to d...Hey Yudha,<br />It really depends on what you want to do. If you want to shoot 1X and higher there is no better way than the MPE-65 but the learning curve is steep. But you can't shoot below life size with the MPE (no infinity focus). Due to flash restrictions (needing to get it close to the subject) I think that long focal length lenses like the 180L are better for natural light photography (with flash for fill only). Obviously working distance is a non issue ;)Dalantechhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17491343159917303555noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1997165993262560791.post-68140559032328831072009-08-08T17:05:09.412-07:002009-08-08T17:05:09.412-07:00BTW never mind my second question, I just read alm...BTW never mind my second question, I just read almost ur whole blog an entire night:PYudhanegara Njomanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16442501152770966102noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1997165993262560791.post-44377559617674675502009-08-08T07:49:00.558-07:002009-08-08T07:49:00.558-07:00Hi, just wanted to ask some questions. Is MP-65E b...Hi, just wanted to ask some questions. Is MP-65E better than 180L? And are most of ur shots using tripod or handholdable? Thanks:)Yudhanegara Njomanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16442501152770966102noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1997165993262560791.post-55783061888841247622009-08-03T20:08:53.700-07:002009-08-03T20:08:53.700-07:00La vida es esto. Prestémosle atención a los
detall...La vida es <b>esto</b>. Prestémosle atención a los<br />detalles. Al calorcito humeante del pis, a sacar la basura, a viajar apretados<br />en colectivo. Si no disfrutamos eso, ¿qué nos queda?Phttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11864475440689588613noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1997165993262560791.post-51322044960288841482009-07-30T16:30:07.498-07:002009-07-30T16:30:07.498-07:00hello... hapi blogging... have a nice day! just vi...hello... hapi blogging... have a nice day! just visiting here....Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1997165993262560791.post-10656192287200928562009-07-27T05:51:47.119-07:002009-07-27T05:51:47.119-07:00Due to the larger photosites, and therfore the lar...Due to the larger photosites, and therfore the larger circle of confusion, a full frame sensor should give you more depth that a crop factor sensor at the same manification and Fstop. So the answer is "yes" -the cropped full frame image will have more depth.Dalantechhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17491343159917303555noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1997165993262560791.post-22418501780233405922009-07-27T02:45:25.265-07:002009-07-27T02:45:25.265-07:00Hi, thanks so much for sharing your skills - it is...Hi, thanks so much for sharing your skills - it is very generous of you but more importantly it makes those secretive macro shooters look very silly :)<br /><br />I shoot with identical gear to yours except my camera is 450D, and I just have a quick question that I could not find an answer to no matter how hard I tried or where I looked: Compared to the smaller sensors of 40D or 450D, would the shot on a full-frame body have more depth of field if it was later cropped in Photoshop to match the smaller sensor's shot? Thanks!Deanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09481727112079398646noreply@blogger.com